Plithogenic back to the data type card28 methods
Plithogenic
Methods that work with Plithogenic data
Every method that works with this data type has a page of its own. Those with an academy card are explained here through their philosophy, how to read their output and worked cases; the rest open on their formula page in the library.
27 academy cards · 1 only in the library · 28 methods in the catalogue
Methods with an academy card
27 cards- TOPSIS extensionsPlithogenic TOPSISThis is the form of TOPSIS for situations where criterion scores are given as a truth-indeterminacy-falsity triple and criteria carry a degree of contradiction relative to one another. Its output is again a closeness score and the ranking that follows from it.Open the card →
- VIKOR extensionsPlithogenic VIKORThis is the form of VIKOR for situations where criterion scores are given as a truth-indeterminacy-falsity triple and criteria carry a degree of contradiction relative to one another. Its output is again a group utility, an individual regret, and a compromise index combining the two.Open the card →
- SAW extensionsPlithogenic SAWThis is the form of SAW for when criteria are given as degrees of truth, indeterminacy and falsity, and a criterion's contradiction to a dominant one is also taken into account. It carries out the weighted combination on these three degrees, and again ranks the result with a single score.Open the card →
- EDAS extensionsPlithogenic EDASThis is the form of EDAS for situations where criterion scores are given as a truth-indeterminacy-falsity triple and criteria carry a degree of contradiction relative to one another. Its output is again an assessment score relative to the set's own average, and the ranking that follows from it.Open the card →
- COPRAS extensionsPlithogenic COPRASThis is the form of COPRAS for situations where criterion scores are given as a truth-indeterminacy-falsity triple and criteria carry a degree of contradiction relative to one another. Its output is again a percentage utility degree relative to the best alternative.Open the card →
- MARCOS extensionsPlithogenic MARCOSThis is the form of MARCOS for situations where criterion scores are given as a truth-indeterminacy-falsity triple and criteria carry a degree of contradiction relative to one another. Its output is again a final utility degree measured against ideal and anti-ideal references.Open the card →
- CODAS extensionsPlithogenic CODASThis is the form of CODAS for situations where criterion evaluation is given as a truth-indeterminacy-falsity triple and criteria carry a degree of contradiction relative to one another. Its output is again an assessment score built from two distinct distance measures, and the ranking that follows from it.Open the card →
- PROMETHEE extensionsPlithogenic PROMETHEEThis is the form of PROMETHEE for situations where criterion scores are given as a truth-indeterminacy-falsity triple and criteria carry a degree of contradiction relative to one another. The output remains a net flow, built from an entering and a leaving flow, and a rank based on that flow.Open the card →
- TODIM extensionsPlithogenic TODIMThis is the form of TODIM for situations where criterion scores are given as a truth-indeterminacy-falsity triple and criteria carry a degree of contradiction relative to one another. It runs the loss-aversion logic over these triples and reduces the result to a single global value.Open the card →
- WASPAS extensionsPlithogenic WASPASThis is the form of WASPAS for when criteria are given as degrees of truth, indeterminacy and falsity, and a criterion's contradiction to a dominant one is also taken into account. It carries out the additive and multiplicative combination with these three degrees, blends the two with λ, and ranks the result with a single score.Open the card →
- ARAS extensionsPlithogenic ARASPlithogenic ARAS is the form of ARAS used when criterion assessment is given as degrees of truth, indeterminacy and falsity, and how contradictory this assessment is in itself is also known. It factors the contradiction share into the calculation beforehand, then computes the additive utility ratio.Open the card →
- MABAC extensionsPlithogenic MABACThis is the form of MABAC for situations where criteria are given as degrees of truth, indeterminacy and falsity, and a contradiction between one criterion and the dominant one is also taken into account. It builds the border approximation area from a single score derived from these three degrees, and ranks alternatives against this border.Open the card →
- MOORA extensionsPlithogenic MOORAThis is the form of MOORA for situations where criterion scores are given as a truth-indeterminacy-falsity triple and criteria carry a degree of contradiction relative to one another. It runs the ratio system on this triple and arrives at a single net score.Open the card →
- GRA extensionsPlithogenic GRAThis is the form of GRA for situations where criterion scores are given as a truth-indeterminacy-falsity triple and criteria carry a degree of contradiction relative to one another. Its output is again a grey relational degree and the ranking that follows from it.Open the card →
- CoCoSo extensionsPlithogenic CoCoSoThis is the form of CoCoSo for situations where criterion scores are given as a truth-indeterminacy-falsity triple and criteria carry a degree of contradiction relative to one another. Its output is again a combined compromise score and the ranking that follows from it.Open the card →
- MULTIMOORA extensionsPlithogenic MULTIMOORAThis is the form of MULTIMOORA for situations where criterion scores are given as a truth-indeterminacy-falsity triple and criteria carry a degree of contradiction relative to one another. The ratio system, the reference point and the full multiplicative form are each computed separately on these triples, and the result is merged into a single rank by the average-rank rule.Open the card →
- WPM extensionsPlithogenic WPMPlithogenic WPM is the form of WPM used when criterion assessments are given as a truth-indeterminacy-falsity triple and criteria carry a degree of contradiction relative to one another. Once adjusted by this contradiction degree, criteria are combined through a weighted geometric aggregation operator (PNWG-like) and reduced to a single score.Open the card →
- SPOTIS extensionsPlithogenic SPOTISThis is the form of SPOTIS for situations where criterion scores are given as a truth-indeterminacy-falsity triple and criteria carry a degree of contradiction relative to one another. It reduces every cell to a single score and computes that score's scaled distance to the ideal.Open the card →
- AROMAN extensionsPlithogenic AROMANThis is the form of AROMAN for situations where criterion scores are given as a truth-indeterminacy-falsity triple and criteria carry a degree of contradiction relative to one another. DecisionMind's implementation applies the base AROMAN's two-normalisation and benefit-cost-balance idea in a simplified form; this is explained explicitly below.Open the card →
- DNMA extensionsPlithogenic DNMAThis is the form of DNMA for situations where criterion scores are given as a truth-indeterminacy-falsity triple and criteria carry a degree of contradiction relative to one another. It combines three separate aggregation measures and again produces a single combined score.Open the card →
- MAUT extensionsPlithogenic MAUTThis is the form of MAUT for situations where criterion values are given as a truth-indeterminacy-falsity triple and criteria carry a degree of contradiction relative to one another. Each criterion is converted to its own utility scale and summed with weights; the output remains a single aggregate utility score.Open the card →
- PSI extensionsPlithogenic PSIThis is the form of PSI for situations where criterion scores are given as a truth-indeterminacy-falsity triple and criteria carry a degree of contradiction relative to one another. It still derives its own weights, and its output remains a preference selection score.Open the card →
- RAFSI extensionsPlithogenic RAFSIThis is the form of RAFSI for situations where criterion scores are given as a truth-indeterminacy-falsity triple and criteria carry a degree of contradiction relative to one another. It maps alternatives onto a fixed-length scale interval and reduces them to a single score.Open the card →
- RAWEC extensionsPlithogenic RAWECThis is the form of RAWEC for situations where criterion scores are given as a truth-indeterminacy-falsity triple and criteria carry a degree of contradiction relative to one another. Its output remains a ranking score built from the sum of weighted contributions.Open the card →
- WISP extensionsPlithogenic WISPPlithogenic WISP is the form of WISP used when the values in the decision table are given as a truth-indeterminacy-falsity triple and criteria carry a degree of contradiction. It computes the four comparison logics over scores adjusted by the criterion's contradiction degree.Open the card →
- OCRA extensionsPlithogenic OCRAPlithogenic OCRA is the form of OCRA for situations where input and output criteria are given as a truth-indeterminacy-falsity triple and each criterion carries a degree of contradiction relative to a dominant criterion. It measures the shortfall on the input side and the superiority on the output side separately on these triples, and merges them into a single score at the end.Open the card →
- ROV extensionsPlithogenic ROVThis is the form of ROV for situations where criterion scores are given as a truth-indeterminacy-falsity triple and criteria carry a degree of contradiction relative to one another. It ranks alternatives by a weighted sum score placed on a fixed [0,1] scale.Open the card →
Other methods in the library
These methods do not yet have an academy card. Their formulae, steps and source citation live in the library; each link opens the method page directly.