This page is published in English.
Ranking
Cross-Validation - k-fold hold-out validation of MCDM decision consistency
Robustness wrapper - k-fold cross-validation for MCDM stability
Stone, M.1974doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x ↗
Overview
Cross-Validation - k-fold hold-out validation of MCDM decision consistency
- Output
- robustness score, higher is better
- Data
- Crisp, complete numeric matrix
- Size
- 2+ alternatives, 3-12 criteria works best
- Used for
- Sensitivity analysis, uncertainty quantification
How it works
- 1
Validate inputs for cross-validation.
Stone 1974, (pending PDF page verification)
Look elsewhere when
- •Quick analysis needed. Defer robustness check.
Assumptions to verify
- A base ranking method is selected
- Computational budget for repeated runs
Edge cases and pitfalls
Applying CROSS-VALIDATION without verifying this assumption.
Requirement: A base ranking method is selected
Applying CROSS-VALIDATION without verifying this assumption.
Requirement: Computational budget for repeated runs
Using CROSS-VALIDATION when: Quick analysis needed → defer robustness check.
An alternative method is recommended in this situation.
How to cite
Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x
System ID, as it appears in reports and the API
CROSS-VALIDATION