This page is published in English.
Ranking
Cubic-WASPAS - Cubic extension of WASPAS
Cubic outranking/ranking - Cubic Fuzzy Set (CuFS: interval [a,b] for internal membership, scalar λ for external)
Jun, Y. B., Kim, C. S., Yang, K. O.2012
Overview
cubic-waspas extends WASPAS to handle Cubic uncertainty. All arithmetic operations (normalisation, weighting, distance computation) are performed using Cubic Fuzzy Set (CuFS: interval [a,b] for internal membership, scalar λ for external) algebra. The final scores are defuzzified via P-order: (a⁻+a⁺)/2 and λ combined before ranking.
- Output
- utility, higher is better
- Data
- Cubic Fuzzy, uncertainty tuples complete
- Weights
- Needs a weight source
- Size
- 2+ alternatives, 3-10 criteria works best
- Used for
- Cubic Set MCDM, MAGDM under epistemic uncertainty, expert-driven evaluation with linguistic terms
Look elsewhere when
- •Crisp data sufficient - use base WASPAS directly (avoid unnecessary uncertainty layer)
- •Aggregation operator (PFWA/PFOWA/etc.) not specified - output ambiguous
Assumptions to verify
- Decision matrix entries are valid Cubic Set numbers/tuples
- Underlying crisp method's compensation assumption holds in uncertain space
- All decision-maker(s) and experts use the same linguistic/uncertainty scale
Edge cases and pitfalls
Value-space violation: ensure all entries satisfy CuFS: A = ⟨[a⁻,a⁺], λ⟩ where [a⁻,a⁺] ⊆ [0,1], λ ∈ [0,1] before computation.
Defuzzification method affects ranking: P-order: (a⁻+a⁺)/2 and λ combined is the canonical choice but alternatives exist.
Works with
Commonly takes its weights from
How to cite
Jun, Y. B.; Kim, C. S.; Yang, K. O. (2012). Cubic sets. Annals of Fuzzy Mathematics and Informatics.
System ID, as it appears in reports and the API
CUBIC-WASPAS