This page is published in English.
Ranking
Grey-COPRAS - Grey extension of COPRAS
Grey outranking/ranking - Grey Interval Number (GIN: [x̲, x̄])
Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A., Turskis, Z., Tamosaitiene, J.2009doi:10.15388/informatica.2009.252 ↗
Overview
grey-copras extends COPRAS to handle Grey uncertainty. All arithmetic operations (normalisation, weighting, distance computation) are performed using Grey Interval Number (GIN: [x̲, x̄]) algebra. The final scores are defuzzified via whitenisation: (x̲ + x̄)/2 before ranking.
- Output
- utility, higher is better
- Data
- Grey Number, uncertainty tuples complete
- Weights
- Needs a weight source
- Size
- 2+ alternatives, 3-10 criteria works best
- Used for
- Grey MCDM, MAGDM under epistemic uncertainty, expert-driven evaluation with linguistic terms
How it works
- 1
Whiten grey matrix. Column-sum normalization: v̄_ij=v̂_ij/Σ_k(v̂_kj). Weighted: v_ij=w_j·v̄_ij.
Zavadskas-Kaklauskas 1996; Deng 1989
- 2
Benefit sum S_i+ = Σ_{j∈Ω_b} v_ij; cost sum S_i- = Σ_{j∈Ω_c} v_ij.
Zavadskas-Kaklauskas 1996 §COPRAS
- 3
Relative significance Q_i and utility degree N_i. Rank descending.
Zavadskas-Kaklauskas 1996 §relative significance
Fits when / Look elsewhere when
Fits when
- •Preserves grey uncertainty through the pipeline rather than premature crispification at elicitation
- •Native group-decision support (multi-DM aggregation built into the pipeline)
Look elsewhere when
- •Crisp data sufficient - use base COPRAS directly (avoid unnecessary uncertainty layer)
- •Aggregation operator (PFWA/PFOWA/etc.) not specified - output ambiguous
Assumptions to verify
- Decision matrix entries are valid Grey numbers/tuples
- Underlying crisp method's compensation assumption holds in uncertain space
- All decision-maker(s) and experts use the same linguistic/uncertainty scale
Limitations
- •Rank reversal known on alternative-set changes (ref: inherited from crisp base; cf. Belton-Gear 1983, Wang-Luo 2009)
Edge cases and pitfalls
Value-space violation: ensure all entries satisfy GIN: x̲ ≤ x̄ (lower and upper bounds of interval) before computation.
Defuzzification method affects ranking: whitenisation: (x̲ + x̄)/2 is the canonical choice but alternatives exist.
Works with
Commonly takes its weights from
How to cite
Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A.; Turskis, Z.; Tamosaitiene, J. (2009). Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Model by Applying Grey Numbers. Informatica. https://doi.org/10.15388/informatica.2009.252
System ID, as it appears in reports and the API
GREY-COPRAS