This page is published in English.
Ranking
Grey-WASPAS - Grey extension of WASPAS
Grey outranking/ranking - Grey Interval Number (GIN: [x̲, x̄])
Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J., Zakarevicius, A.2012doi:10.5755/j01.eee.122.6.1810 ↗
Overview
grey-waspas extends WASPAS to handle Grey uncertainty. All arithmetic operations (normalisation, weighting, distance computation) are performed using Grey Interval Number (GIN: [x̲, x̄]) algebra. The final scores are defuzzified via whitenisation: (x̲ + x̄)/2 before ranking.
- Output
- utility, higher is better
- Data
- Grey Number, uncertainty tuples complete
- Weights
- Needs a weight source
- Size
- 2+ alternatives, 3-10 criteria works best
- Used for
- Grey MCDM, MAGDM under epistemic uncertainty, expert-driven evaluation with linguistic terms
How it works
- 1
Normalize grey matrix (benefit/cost); whiten: v̂_ij=½(v_ij^L+v_ij^U).
Zavadskas-Turskis 2012; Deng 1989
- 2
WSM score: Q_i^(1) = Σ_j w_j·v̂_ij.
Zavadskas-Turskis 2012 §WSM
- 3
WPM score: Q_i^(2) = Π_j v̂_ij^(w_j).
Zavadskas-Turskis 2012 §WPM
- 4
Combined: Q_i = λ·Q_i^(1) + (1-λ)·Q_i^(2), λ=0.5. Rank descending.
Zavadskas-Turskis 2012 §combined WASPAS
Fits when / Look elsewhere when
Fits when
- •Preserves grey uncertainty through the pipeline rather than premature crispification at elicitation
- •Native group-decision support (multi-DM aggregation built into the pipeline)
Look elsewhere when
- •Crisp data sufficient - use base WASPAS directly (avoid unnecessary uncertainty layer)
- •Aggregation operator (PFWA/PFOWA/etc.) not specified - output ambiguous
Assumptions to verify
- Decision matrix entries are valid Grey numbers/tuples
- Underlying crisp method's compensation assumption holds in uncertain space
- All decision-maker(s) and experts use the same linguistic/uncertainty scale
Limitations
- •Rank reversal known on alternative-set changes (ref: inherited from crisp base; cf. Belton-Gear 1983, Wang-Luo 2009)
Edge cases and pitfalls
Value-space violation: ensure all entries satisfy GIN: x̲ ≤ x̄ (lower and upper bounds of interval) before computation.
Defuzzification method affects ranking: whitenisation: (x̲ + x̄)/2 is the canonical choice but alternatives exist.
Works with
Commonly takes its weights from
How to cite
Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z.; Antucheviciene, J.; Zakarevicius, A. (2012). Optimization of Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment. Electronics and Electrical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.eee.122.6.1810
System ID, as it appears in reports and the API
GREY-WASPAS