This page is published in English.
Ranking
MULTIMOORA - Multi-Objective Optimisation by Ratio Analysis plus Full Multiplicative Form
Dominance aggregation of three sub-rankings (RS + RP + FMF)
Brauers, W. K. M., Zavadskas, E. K.2010doi:10.3846/tede.2010.01 ↗
Overview
MULTIMOORA produces three sub-rankings (RS: higher y better; RP: lower d better; FMF: higher U better) and aggregates them via dominance theory - the alternative dominating in ≥2 sub-rankings wins its position. When all three sub-rankings agree, the result is robust. When they disagree, inspect each sub-ranking individually to understand the trade-off.
- Output
- utility, higher is better
- Data
- Crisp, complete numeric matrix
- Weights
- Needs a weight source
- Size
- 2+ alternatives, 3-12 criteria works best
- Used for
- Alternative selection, Supplier evaluation
How it works
- 1
Vector normalisation r_ij.
Brauers-Zavadskas 2010, p.7 Eq.(2)
- 2
Ratio System y_i = Σ benefit − Σ cost.
Brauers-Zavadskas 2010, p.7 Eq.(3)
- 3
Reference Point z_i = max(|w_j r_j* − w_j r_ij|).
Brauers-Zavadskas 2010, p.8 Eq.(5)
- 4
Full Multiplicative Form U_i = Π benefit / Π cost.
Brauers-Zavadskas 2010, p.8 Eq.(7)
- 5
Dominance theory aggregation of three rankings.
Brauers-Zavadskas 2010, p.9
Look elsewhere when
Assumptions to verify
- Criteria preferences are independent (no synergistic interactions)
- Compensation is acceptable: high score on one criterion can offset low on another
- Decision matrix is complete (no missing values)
Edge cases and pitfalls
FMF requires all x_ij > 0 - zero or negative raw values invalidate the full multiplicative form.
Works with
How to cite
Brauers, W. K. M.; Zavadskas, E. K. (2010). Project management by MULTIMOORA as an instrument for transition economies. Technological and Economic Development of Economy. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.01
System ID, as it appears in reports and the API
MULTIMOORA