This page is published in English.
Ranking
N-AROMAN - Neutrosophic extension of AROMAN
Neutrosophic outranking/ranking - Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS: T, I, F; T,I,F ∈ [0,1], T+I+F ≤ 3)
Bošković et al.2023doi:10.1109/access.2023.3265818 ↗
Overview
n-aroman extends AROMAN to handle Neutrosophic uncertainty. All arithmetic operations (normalisation, weighting, distance computation) are performed using Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS: T, I, F; T,I,F ∈ [0,1], T+I+F ≤ 3) algebra. The final scores are defuzzified via score function S = (T − F + 1)/2 before ranking.
- Output
- utility, higher is better
- Data
- Single-Valued Neutrosophic, uncertainty tuples complete
- Weights
- Needs a weight source
- Size
- 2+ alternatives, 3-10 criteria works best
- Used for
- Single-Valued Neutrosophic MCDM, MAGDM under epistemic uncertainty, expert-driven evaluation with linguistic terms
How it works
- 1
Compute SVN score for each rating.
Bošković et al. 2023, Sec.3 Step1; Biswas 2016 score
- 2
Step-1 linear normalisation of SVN scores.
Bošković et al. 2023, Sec.3 Step2
- 3
Step-2 vector normalisation of linearly-normalised scores.
Bošković et al. 2023, Sec.3 Step3
- 4
Combined two-step normalised value.
Bošković et al. 2023, Sec.3 Step4
- 5
AROMAN composite score; rank descending.
Bošković et al. 2023, Sec.3 Step5-6
Fits when / Look elsewhere when
Fits when
- •Preserves single_valued_neutrosophic uncertainty through the pipeline rather than premature crispification at elicitation
- •Native group-decision support (multi-DM aggregation built into the pipeline)
Look elsewhere when
- •Crisp data sufficient - use base AROMAN directly (avoid unnecessary uncertainty layer)
- •Aggregation operator (PFWA/PFOWA/etc.) not specified - output ambiguous
Assumptions to verify
- Decision matrix entries are valid Single-Valued Neutrosophic numbers/tuples
- Underlying crisp method's compensation assumption holds in uncertain space
- All decision-maker(s) and experts use the same linguistic/uncertainty scale
Edge cases and pitfalls
Value-space violation: ensure all entries satisfy SVNS: T,I,F ∈ [0,1]; 0 ≤ T+I+F ≤ 3 before computation.
Defuzzification method affects ranking: score function S = (T − F + 1)/2 is the canonical choice but alternatives exist.
Works with
Commonly takes its weights from
How to cite
Bošković et al. (2023). Neutrosophic Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for two-step Normalization. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3265818
System ID, as it appears in reports and the API
N-AROMAN