This page is published in English.
Ranking
N-RAFSI - Neutrosophic extension of RAFSI
Neutrosophic outranking/ranking - Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS: T, I, F; T,I,F ∈ [0,1], T+I+F ≤ 3)
Overview
n-rafsi extends RAFSI to handle Neutrosophic uncertainty. All arithmetic operations (normalisation, weighting, distance computation) are performed using Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS: T, I, F; T,I,F ∈ [0,1], T+I+F ≤ 3) algebra. The final scores are defuzzified via score function S = (T − F + 1)/2 before ranking.
- Output
- utility, higher is better
- Data
- Single-Valued Neutrosophic, uncertainty tuples complete
- Weights
- Needs a weight source
- Size
- 2+ alternatives, 3-10 criteria works best
- Used for
- Single-Valued Neutrosophic MCDM, MAGDM under epistemic uncertainty, expert-driven evaluation with linguistic terms
How it works
- 1
SVN score extraction.
Žižović et al. 2020, Sec.2; SVN score Ye 2014
- 2
Ideal and non-ideal scores per criterion.
Žižović et al. 2020, Sec.2 Step2
- 3
Map scores to [1, n_CI] interval.
Žižović et al. 2020, Sec.2 Step3
- 4
RAFSI composite score.
Žižović et al. 2020, Sec.2 Step4
- 5
Rank descending by R_i.
Žižović et al. 2020, Sec.2 Step5
Fits when / Look elsewhere when
Fits when
- •Preserves single_valued_neutrosophic uncertainty through the pipeline rather than premature crispification at elicitation
- •Native group-decision support (multi-DM aggregation built into the pipeline)
Look elsewhere when
- •Crisp data sufficient - use base RAFSI directly (avoid unnecessary uncertainty layer)
- •Aggregation operator (PFWA/PFOWA/etc.) not specified - output ambiguous
Assumptions to verify
- Decision matrix entries are valid Single-Valued Neutrosophic numbers/tuples
- Underlying crisp method's compensation assumption holds in uncertain space
- All decision-maker(s) and experts use the same linguistic/uncertainty scale
Edge cases and pitfalls
Value-space violation: ensure all entries satisfy SVNS: T,I,F ∈ [0,1]; 0 ≤ T+I+F ≤ 3 before computation.
Defuzzification method affects ranking: score function S = (T − F + 1)/2 is the canonical choice but alternatives exist.
If extras.ideal_points/anti_ideal_points are not supplied, the anchors are derived from the observed data and the RAFSI rank-reversal-free guarantee does NOT hold: scores of existing alternatives can shift when an alternative is added or removed. Declare fixed anchors to keep the guarantee.
Works with
Commonly takes its weights from
How to cite
. N-RAFSI - Internal Extension (no SVN-RAFSI paper in literature).
System ID, as it appears in reports and the API
N-RAFSI