Ranking
N-RAWEC: Neutrosophic extension of RAWEC
Mohamed, Mai, Salam, Amira, Ye, Jun · 2024
Overview
Neutrosophic outranking/ranking: Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS: T, I, F; T,I,F ∈ [0,1], T+I+F ≤ 3). Output typically utility (higher value = preferred).
Strengths
- •Method-specific: Neutrosophic outranking/ranking: Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS: T, I, F; T,I,F ∈ [0,1], T+I+F ≤ 3)
- •Preserves single_valued_neutrosophic uncertainty through the pipeline rather than premature crispification at elicitation
- •Native group-decision support (multi-DM aggregation built into the pipeline)
Limitations
- •Assumes: Decision matrix entries are valid Single-Valued Neutrosophic numbers/tuples
- •Assumes: Underlying crisp method's compensation assumption holds in uncertain space
- •Assumes: All decision-maker(s) and experts use the same linguistic/uncertainty scale
Method assistant
Grounded explanations: it explains the method, it does not compute.
Assumptions to verify
- •Decision matrix entries are valid Single-Valued Neutrosophic numbers/tuples
- •Underlying crisp method's compensation assumption holds in uncertain space
- •All decision-maker(s) and experts use the same linguistic/uncertainty scale
When not to use
- •Crisp data sufficient: use base RAWEC directly (avoid unnecessary uncertainty layer)
- •Aggregation operator (PFWA/PFOWA/etc.) not specified: output ambiguous
Edge cases
- •See F.steps and D.parameters for N-RAWEC-specific edge handling. recommendation_metadata.assumptions_to_verify also lists boundary conditions.
Common pitfalls
- •Hatalı: 'N-RAWEC bu varsayımı kontrol etmeden uygulamak'. Doğrusu: Decision matrix entries are valid Single-Valued Neutrosophic numbers/tuples
- •Hatalı: 'N-RAWEC bu varsayımı kontrol etmeden uygulamak'. Doğrusu: Underlying crisp method's compensation assumption holds in uncertain space
- •Hatalı: 'N-RAWEC bu varsayımı kontrol etmeden uygulamak'. Doğrusu: All decision-maker(s) and experts use the same linguistic/uncertainty scale
- •Hatalı: N-RAWEC'yi 'Crisp data sufficient' durumunda kullanmak: recommendation_metadata.not_recommended_when alternatif öneriyor.
- •Hatalı: N-RAWEC'yi 'Aggregation operator (PFWA/PFOWA/etc.) not specified' durumunda kullanmak: recommendation_metadata.not_recommended_when alternatif öneriyor.
Worked example
- 1.Adım 1 (F1): NS karar matrisini oluştur, score fonksiyonu ile crispify: s_ij = (1+T-2I-F)/2.
- 2.Adım 2 (F2): İki yönlü normalizasyon. Fayda: n_ij = s_ij/max_i(s_ij). Non-fayda: n*_ij = min_i(s_ij)/s_ij.
- 3.Adım 3 (F3): Sapma toplamları. v_i = Σ w_j(1−n_ij), v*_i = Σ w_j(1−n*_ij).
- 4.Adım 4 (F4): RAWEC indeksi. Q_i = (v*_i − v_i)/(v*_i + v_i). Aralık [−1,1].
- 5.Adım 5 (F5): Q_i'ye göre azalan sıralama. Paper sonucu: A1=0.188 > A2=−0.024 > A4=−0.082 > A3=−0.193.
Commonly paired with
- •n_a + N-RAWEC (common)
How to cite
Mohamed, Mai; Salam, Amira; Ye, Jun (2024). Selection of Sustainable Material for the Construction of Drone Aerodynamic Wing using Neutrosophic RAWEC. Systems Assessment and Engineering Management. https://doi.org/10.61356/j.saem.2024.1295