Ranking
OCRA: Operational Competitiveness Rating
Parkan, C. · 1994
Overview
Preference rating (input/output separation). Output typically utility (higher value = preferred).
Strengths
- •Method-specific: Preference rating (input/output separation)
Limitations
- •Assumes: Criteria preferences are independent (no synergistic interactions)
- •Assumes: Compensation is acceptable: high score on one criterion can offset low on another
- •Assumes: Decision matrix is complete (no missing values)
Method assistant
Grounded explanations: it explains the method, it does not compute.
Assumptions to verify
- •Criteria preferences are independent (no synergistic interactions)
- •Compensation is acceptable: high score on one criterion can offset low on another
- •Decision matrix is complete (no missing values)
When not to use
- •Criteria strongly correlated → consider DEMATEL/ANP for interdependence
- •Non-compensatory preferences → consider outranking (ELECTRE/PROMETHEE)
Edge cases
- •See F.steps and D.parameters for OCRA-specific edge handling. recommendation_metadata.assumptions_to_verify also lists boundary conditions.
Common pitfalls
- •Hatalı: 'OCRA bu varsayımı kontrol etmeden uygulamak'. Doğrusu: Criteria preferences are independent (no synergistic interactions)
- •Hatalı: 'OCRA bu varsayımı kontrol etmeden uygulamak'. Doğrusu: Compensation is acceptable: high score on one criterion can offset low on another
- •Hatalı: 'OCRA bu varsayımı kontrol etmeden uygulamak'. Doğrusu: Decision matrix is complete (no missing values)
- •Hatalı: OCRA'yi 'Criteria strongly correlated → consider DEMATEL/ANP for interdependence' durumunda kullanmak: recommendation_metadata.not_recommended_when alternatif öneriyor.
- •Hatalı: OCRA'yi 'Non-compensatory preferences → consider outranking (ELECTRE/PROMETHEE)' durumunda kullanmak: recommendation_metadata.not_recommended_when alternatif öneriyor.
Worked example
- 1.Adım 1 (F1): Step 1: Aggregated input (cost) preference Ī_i. Formül: \bar{I}_{i} = \sum_{j\in J^{-}} w_{j} \dfrac{\max_{k} x_{kj} - x_{ij}}{\min_{k} x_{kj}} Anchor: Parkan 1994, p.6 Eq.(1)
- 2.Adım 2 (F2): Step 2: Aggregated output (benefit) preference Ō_i. Formül: \bar{O}_{i} = \sum_{j\in J^{+}} w_{j} \dfrac{x_{ij} - \min_{k} x_{kj}}{\min_{k} x_{kj}} Anchor: Parkan 1994, p.6 Eq.(2)
- 3.Adım 3 (F3): Step 3: Overall preference P_i = (Ī_i − min Ī) + (Ō_i − min Ō) − min[(Ī_i − min Ī) + (Ō_i − min Ō)]. Formül: P_{i} = \big(\bar{I}_{i} - \min_{k}\bar{I}_{k}\big) + \big(\bar{O}_{i} - \min_{k}\bar{O}_{k}\big) - \min_{i'}\big[\cdot\big] Anchor: Parkan 1994, p.7 Eq.(3)
Commonly paired with
- •AHP + OCRA (high)
- •BWM + OCRA (high)
- •ENTROPY + OCRA (high)
- •CRITIC + OCRA (high)
- •SWARA + OCRA (high)
How to cite
Parkan, C. (1994). Operational competitiveness ratings of production units. Managerial and Decision Economics. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4090150303