This page is published in English.
Ranking
OCRA - Operational Competitiveness Rating
Preference rating (input/output separation)
Parkan, C.1994doi:10.1002/mde.4090150303 ↗
Overview
P_i ≥ 0 (the minimum always equals 0 by construction). Higher P means better overall operational competitiveness. OCRA naturally separates input (cost) and output (benefit) criteria, making it intuitive for production/efficiency evaluation where inputs are resources consumed and outputs are products/services delivered.
- Output
- utility, higher is better
- Data
- Crisp, complete numeric matrix
- Weights
- Needs a weight source
- Size
- 2+ alternatives, 3-12 criteria works best
- Used for
- Alternative selection, Supplier evaluation
How it works
- 1
Aggregated input (cost) preference Ī_i.
Parkan 1994, p.6 Eq.(1)
- 2
Aggregated output (benefit) preference Ō_i.
Parkan 1994, p.6 Eq.(2)
- 3
Overall preference P_i = (Ī_i − min Ī) + (Ō_i − min Ō) − min[(Ī_i − min Ī) + (Ō_i − min Ō)].
Parkan 1994, p.7 Eq.(3)
Look elsewhere when
Assumptions to verify
- Criteria preferences are independent (no synergistic interactions)
- Compensation is acceptable: high score on one criterion can offset low on another
- Decision matrix is complete (no missing values)
Edge cases and pitfalls
Applying OCRA when there are no cost criteria (all benefit): Ī = 0 for all, P reduces to Ō ranking only.
Works with
How to cite
Parkan, C. (1994). Operational competitiveness ratings of production units. Managerial and Decision Economics. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4090150303
System ID, as it appears in reports and the API
OCRA