This page is published in English.
Ranking
Prob-ARAS - Stochastic extension of PROB-ARAS
Monte Carlo / stochastic weight uncertainty extension of ARAS
Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.2010doi:10.3846/tede.2010.10 ↗
Overview
prob-aras extends PROB-ARAS to handle Stochastic uncertainty. All arithmetic operations (normalisation, weighting, distance computation) are performed using Stochastic element (distribution or scenario probabilities) algebra. The final scores are defuzzified via expected value E[x] = Σ p_k x_k before ranking.
- Output
- utility, higher is better
- Data
- Stochastic, uncertainty tuples complete
- Weights
- Needs a weight source
- Size
- 2+ alternatives, 3-10 criteria works best
- Used for
- Probabilistic (Stochastic) MCDM, MAGDM under epistemic uncertainty, expert-driven evaluation with linguistic terms
Look elsewhere when
- •Crisp data sufficient - use base ARAS directly (avoid unnecessary uncertainty layer)
- •Aggregation operator (PFWA/PFOWA/etc.) not specified - output ambiguous
Assumptions to verify
- Decision matrix entries are valid Probabilistic (Stochastic) numbers/tuples
- Underlying crisp method's compensation assumption holds in uncertain space
- All decision-maker(s) and experts use the same linguistic/uncertainty scale
Edge cases and pitfalls
Value-space violation: ensure all entries satisfy Probabilities p_k ≥ 0, Σ p_k = 1 for each scenario before computation.
Defuzzification method affects ranking: expected value E[x] = Σ p_k x_k is the canonical choice but alternatives exist.
Works with
Commonly takes its weights from
How to cite
Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.10
System ID, as it appears in reports and the API
PROB-ARAS