This page is published in English.
Ranking
PROBID - Preference Ranking on the Basis of Ideal-Average Distance
Multi-ideal distance ranking with harmonic weighting
Wang, Z., Rangaiah, G. P., Wang, X.2021doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.1c01413 ↗
Overview
Higher p_i = better. PROBID considers all m ideal solutions (ranked alternatives) and weights closer ideals more heavily. Complexity O(m²n) - suitable for moderate-size problems.
- Data
- Crisp
- Weights
- Needs a weight source
How it works
- 1
Apply vector normalization F_ij=f_ij/√Σf_kj² to every criterion; criterion direction is handled while constructing the ordered ideal solutions.
Wang et al. 2021 Eq. (2.1)
- 2
Weighted normalized matrix v_ij = w_j · r_ij.
Wang et al. 2021 §2
- 3
Construct A(k) from the k-th largest benefit value and k-th smallest cost value; compute the average solution.
Wang et al. 2021 Eqs. (2.3)-(2.5)
- 4
Euclidean distances: S_i(k) = distance from alt i to k-th ideal A(k); S_i(avg) = distance from alt i to average ideal Ā.
Wang et al. 2021 §2
- 5
Positive ideals use k=1..⌈m/2⌉; negative ideals use k=⌊m/2⌋+1..m, so odd m shares the middle ideal while even m does not. Then R_i=S_pos/S_neg and P_i=1/(1+R_i²)+S_i(avg).
Wang et al. 2021 Eqs. (2.8)-(2.11)
Edge cases and pitfalls
O(m²) distance matrix - for large m (>100) becomes expensive.
How to cite
Wang, Z.; Rangaiah, G. P.; Wang, X. (2021). Preference ranking on the basis of ideal-average distance method for multi-criteria decision-making. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c01413
System ID, as it appears in reports and the API
PROBID