This page is published in English.
Ranking
qR-MARCOS - q-Rung Orthopair extension of MARCOS
q-Rung Orthopair outranking/ranking - q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Number (q-ROFN: μ, ν; μ^q+ν^q ≤ 1, q ≥ 1)
Yager, R. R.2017doi:10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2604005 ↗
Overview
QR-MARCOS reads every cell as a q-rung orthopair pair (mu, nu). Cost criteria are replaced by their complement, each cell becomes a score S = (1 + mu^q - nu^q)/2 in [0, 1], and the MARCOS utility ladder runs on the weighted score matrix. This is a derived construction: no accessible published q-ROF MARCOS worked example exists, so the cell handling follows Yager 2017 and Wang 2020 while the ladder follows the open-access crisp MARCOS formulation of Ismail et al. 2026.
- Output
- utility, higher is better
- Data
- Q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy, uncertainty tuples complete
- Weights
- Needs a weight source
- Size
- 2+ alternatives, 3-10 criteria works best
- Used for
- Q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy MCDM, MAGDM under epistemic uncertainty, expert-driven evaluation with linguistic terms
Look elsewhere when
- •Crisp data sufficient - use base MARCOS directly (avoid unnecessary uncertainty layer)
- •Aggregation operator (PFWA/PFOWA/etc.) not specified - output ambiguous
Assumptions to verify
- Decision matrix entries are valid q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy numbers/tuples
- Underlying crisp method's compensation assumption holds in uncertain space
- All decision-maker(s) and experts use the same linguistic/uncertainty scale
Edge cases and pitfalls
Value-space violation: ensure all entries satisfy q-ROFN: μ^q + ν^q ≤ 1, q ≥ 1 (q=1→IFS; q=2→PFS) before computation.
The score function fixes how a cell is read: S = (1 + mu^q - nu^q)/2 stays in [0, 1], which the MARCOS utility ratios need; a score that can turn negative breaks them.
Works with
Commonly takes its weights from
How to cite
Yager, R. R. (2017). Generalized orthopair fuzzy sets. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2604005
System ID, as it appears in reports and the API
QR-MARCOS