This page is published in English.
Ranking
RIM - Reference Ideal Method
Distance to user-defined reference intervals (ideal + anti-ideal)
Cables, E., Lamata, M. T., Verdegay, J. L.2016doi:10.1016/j.ins.2015.12.011 ↗
Overview
I_i∈[0,1]. Higher I means the weighted normalized alternative P_i is closer to the ideal vector w and farther from the non-ideal vector 0. The reference interval lets the decision maker specify a satisficing range rather than only an extreme point.
- Output
- utility, higher is better
- Data
- Crisp, complete numeric matrix
- Weights
- Needs a weight source
- Size
- 2+ alternatives, 3-12 criteria works best
- Used for
- Alternative selection, Supplier evaluation
How it works
- 1
x_ij değerini [A_j,B_j] aralığı ve [C_j,D_j] referans idealiyle parçalı olarak n_ij∈[0,1] değerine dönüştür.
- 2
p_ij=n_ijw_j; A_i^+=||P_i−w||₂ ve A_i^−=||P_i||₂ uzaklıklarını hesapla.
- 3
I_i=A_i^−/(A_i^++A_i^−) göreli indeksini hesapla ve azalan sırala.
Look elsewhere when
Assumptions to verify
- Criteria preferences are independent (no synergistic interactions)
- Compensation is acceptable: high score on one criterion can offset low on another
- Decision matrix is complete (no missing values)
Edge cases and pitfalls
If A_i^+ + A_i^- is zero, the relative index is undefined and the kernel fails closed.
Works with
How to cite
Cables, E.; Lamata, M. T.; Verdegay, J. L. (2016). RIM-reference ideal method in multicriteria decision making. Information Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2015.12.011
System ID, as it appears in reports and the API
RIM