This page is published in English.
Ranking
Rough-SAW - Rough extension of SAW
Rough outranking/ranking - Rough number (lower approximation L, upper approximation U)
Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Zavadskas, E.K., Ćirović, G., Prentkovskis, O.2017doi:10.3390/sym9110264 ↗
Overview
rough-saw extends SAW to handle Rough uncertainty. All arithmetic operations (normalisation, weighting, distance computation) are performed using Rough number (lower approximation L, upper approximation U) algebra. The final scores are defuzzified via midpoint (L+U)/2 before ranking.
- Output
- utility, higher is better
- Data
- Rough Number, uncertainty tuples complete
- Weights
- Needs a weight source
- Size
- 2+ alternatives, 3-10 criteria works best
- Used for
- Rough MCDM, MAGDM under epistemic uncertainty, expert-driven evaluation with linguistic terms
Look elsewhere when
- •Crisp data sufficient - use base SAW directly (avoid unnecessary uncertainty layer)
- •Aggregation operator (PFWA/PFOWA/etc.) not specified - output ambiguous
Assumptions to verify
- Decision matrix entries are valid Rough numbers/tuples
- Underlying crisp method's compensation assumption holds in uncertain space
- All decision-maker(s) and experts use the same linguistic/uncertainty scale
Edge cases and pitfalls
Value-space violation: ensure all entries satisfy Rough: L ≤ U; approximations defined by equivalence classes before computation.
Defuzzification method affects ranking: midpoint (L+U)/2 is the canonical choice but alternatives exist.
Works with
Commonly takes its weights from
How to cite
Stević, Ž.; Pamučar, D.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Ćirović, G.; Prentkovskis, O. (2017). The Selection of Wagons for the Internal Transport of a Logistics Company: A Novel Approach Based on Rough BWM and Rough SAW Methods. Symmetry. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9110264
System ID, as it appears in reports and the API
ROUGH-SAW