Ranking
Rough-TODIM: Rough extension of TODIM
Tiwari, V., Khanna, P., Tandon, P. · 2024
Method assistant
Grounded explanations: it explains the method, it does not compute.
Assumptions to verify
- •Decision matrix entries are valid Rough numbers/tuples
- •Underlying crisp method's compensation assumption holds in uncertain space
- •All decision-maker(s) and experts use the same linguistic/uncertainty scale
When not to use
- •Crisp data sufficient: use base TODIM directly (avoid unnecessary uncertainty layer)
- •Aggregation operator (PFWA/PFOWA/etc.) not specified: output ambiguous
Commonly paired with
- •n_a + ROUGH-TODIM (common)
How to cite
Tiwari, V.; Khanna, P.; Tandon, P. (2024). Capturing Design Intent During Concept Evaluation Using Rough Numbers and TODIM Method. Computer-Aided Design & Applications. https://doi.org/10.14733/cadaps.2024.215-228