This page is published in English.
Ranking
SF-TODIM - Spherical extension of TODIM
Spherical outranking/ranking - Spherical Fuzzy Set (SFS: μ, ν, π; μ²+ν²+π² ≤ 1)
Kutlu Gündoğdu, F., Kahraman, C.2019doi:10.3233/JIFS-181401 ↗
Overview
sf-todim extends TODIM to handle Spherical uncertainty. All arithmetic operations (normalisation, weighting, distance computation) are performed using Spherical Fuzzy Set (SFS: μ, ν, π; μ²+ν²+π² ≤ 1) algebra. The final scores are defuzzified via score function S = μ² − ν² before ranking.
- Output
- utility, higher is better
- Data
- Spherical Fuzzy, uncertainty tuples complete
- Weights
- Needs a weight source
- Size
- 2+ alternatives, 3-10 criteria works best
- Used for
- Spherical Fuzzy MCDM, MAGDM under epistemic uncertainty, expert-driven evaluation with linguistic terms
Look elsewhere when
- •Crisp data sufficient - use base TODIM directly (avoid unnecessary uncertainty layer)
- •Aggregation operator (PFWA/PFOWA/etc.) not specified - output ambiguous
Assumptions to verify
- Decision matrix entries are valid Spherical Fuzzy numbers/tuples
- Underlying crisp method's compensation assumption holds in uncertain space
- All decision-maker(s) and experts use the same linguistic/uncertainty scale
Edge cases and pitfalls
Value-space violation: ensure all entries satisfy SFS: μ,ν,π ∈ [0,1]; μ²+ν²+π² ≤ 1 before computation.
Defuzzification method affects ranking: score function S = μ² − ν² is the canonical choice but alternatives exist.
Works with
Commonly takes its weights from
How to cite
Kutlu Gündoğdu, F.; Kahraman, C. (2019). Spherical fuzzy sets and spherical fuzzy TOPSIS method. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-181401
System ID, as it appears in reports and the API
SF-TODIM