Ranking
SPOTIS: Stable Preference Ordering Towards Ideal Solution
Dezert, J., Tchamova, A., Han, D., Tacnet, J. M. · 2020
Overview
Normalised distance to ideal (rank-reversal free). Output typically utility (higher value = preferred).
Strengths
- •Method-specific: Normalised distance to ideal (rank-reversal free)
Limitations
- •Assumes: Criteria preferences are independent (no synergistic interactions)
- •Assumes: Compensation is acceptable: high score on one criterion can offset low on another
- •Assumes: Decision matrix is complete (no missing values)
Method assistant
Grounded explanations: it explains the method, it does not compute.
Assumptions to verify
- •Criteria preferences are independent (no synergistic interactions)
- •Compensation is acceptable: high score on one criterion can offset low on another
- •Decision matrix is complete (no missing values)
When not to use
- •Criteria strongly correlated → consider DEMATEL/ANP for interdependence
- •Non-compensatory preferences → consider outranking (ELECTRE/PROMETHEE)
Edge cases
- •See F.steps and D.parameters for SPOTIS-specific edge handling. recommendation_metadata.assumptions_to_verify also lists boundary conditions.
Common pitfalls
- •Hatalı: 'SPOTIS bu varsayımı kontrol etmeden uygulamak'. Doğrusu: Criteria preferences are independent (no synergistic interactions)
- •Hatalı: 'SPOTIS bu varsayımı kontrol etmeden uygulamak'. Doğrusu: Compensation is acceptable: high score on one criterion can offset low on another
- •Hatalı: 'SPOTIS bu varsayımı kontrol etmeden uygulamak'. Doğrusu: Decision matrix is complete (no missing values)
- •Hatalı: SPOTIS'yi 'Criteria strongly correlated → consider DEMATEL/ANP for interdependence' durumunda kullanmak: recommendation_metadata.not_recommended_when alternatif öneriyor.
- •Hatalı: SPOTIS'yi 'Non-compensatory preferences → consider outranking (ELECTRE/PROMETHEE)' durumunda kullanmak: recommendation_metadata.not_recommended_when alternatif öneriyor.
Worked example
- 1.Adım 1 (F1): Step 1: Define bounds S_j^{min}, S_j^{max} per criterion (Stable Preference). Formül: S_{j} = [S_{j}^{\min}, S_{j}^{\max}],\quad S_{j}^{*}=S_{j}^{\max}\ (J^{+})\ \text{or}\ S_{j}^{\min}\ (J^{-}) Anchor: Dezert 2020, p.3 Eq.(1)
- 2.Adım 2 (F2): Step 2: Normalised distance from ideal δ_ij = |x_ij − S_j*| / (S_j^max − S_j^min). Formül: \delta_{ij} = \dfrac{|x_{ij} - S_{j}^{*}|}{S_{j}^{\max} - S_{j}^{\min}} Anchor: Dezert 2020, p.3 Eq.(2)
- 3.Adım 3 (F3): Step 3: Weighted aggregated distance D_i = Σ w_j δ_ij; ASCENDING ranking (smaller is better). Formül: D_{i} = \sum_{j=1}^{n} w_{j}\,\delta_{ij},\quad \text{rank ascending} Anchor: Dezert 2020, p.3 Eq.(3)
Commonly paired with
- •AHP + SPOTIS (high)
- •BWM + SPOTIS (high)
- •ENTROPY + SPOTIS (high)
- •CRITIC + SPOTIS (high)
- •SWARA + SPOTIS (high)
How to cite
Dezert, J.; Tchamova, A.; Han, D.; Tacnet, J. M. (2020). The SPOTIS rank reversal free method for multi-criteria decision-making support. 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION). https://doi.org/10.23919/FUSION45008.2020.9190347