This page is published in English.
Ranking
SPROBID - Simplified PROBID using Top/Bottom Quartile Ideal Sets
Multi-ideal distance ranking with quartile-based ideal selection
Wang, Z., Rangaiah, G. P., Wang, X.2021doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.1c01413 ↗
Overview
Higher p_i = better. SPROBID is faster than PROBID: uses top/bottom ⌊m/4⌋ ideals instead of half. Best for m ≥ 4. For m < 4 falls back to trivial case.
- Data
- Crisp
- Weights
- Needs a weight source
How it works
- 1
Steps F1-F4 identical to PROBID: vector normalization → weighted matrix → m ideal solutions → Euclidean distances Si and Si_average.
Wang et al. 2021 §2 (SPROBID variant)
- 2
Step F2 (SPROBID-specific) - Use top ⌊m/4⌋ ideals for positive-ideal distance and bottom ⌊m/4⌋ for negative-ideal distance (quartile selection instead of PROBID's ⌈m/2⌉). S_pos_i = Σ_{k=1}^{⌊m/4⌋} S_i(k)/k; S_neg_i = Σ_{k=m+1-⌊m/4⌋}^{m} S_i(k)/(m-k+1). Final p_i = S_neg_i / S_pos_i. Rank descending.
Wang et al. 2021 §2 SPROBID variant
Edge cases and pitfalls
For m < 4, quartile selection degenerates (pymcdm fallback: Si_pos = Si[:,0], Si_neg = Si[:,-1]).
How to cite
Wang, Z.; Rangaiah, G. P.; Wang, X. (2021). Preference ranking on the basis of ideal-average distance method for multi-criteria decision-making. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c01413
System ID, as it appears in reports and the API
SPROBID