Ranking
WEDBA: Weighted Euclidean Distance Based Approach
Dadelo, S., Turskis, Z., Zavadskas, E. K., Dadeliene, R. · 2014
Overview
Distance-based with vector normalisation. Output typically utility (higher value = preferred).
Strengths
- •Method-specific: Distance-based with vector normalisation
Limitations
- •Assumes: Criteria preferences are independent (no synergistic interactions)
- •Assumes: Compensation is acceptable: high score on one criterion can offset low on another
- •Assumes: Decision matrix is complete (no missing values)
Method assistant
Grounded explanations: it explains the method, it does not compute.
Assumptions to verify
- •Criteria preferences are independent (no synergistic interactions)
- •Compensation is acceptable: high score on one criterion can offset low on another
- •Decision matrix is complete (no missing values)
When not to use
- •Criteria strongly correlated → consider DEMATEL/ANP for interdependence
- •Non-compensatory preferences → consider outranking (ELECTRE/PROMETHEE)
Edge cases
- •See F.steps and D.parameters for WEDBA-specific edge handling. recommendation_metadata.assumptions_to_verify also lists boundary conditions.
Common pitfalls
- •Hatalı: 'WEDBA bu varsayımı kontrol etmeden uygulamak'. Doğrusu: Criteria preferences are independent (no synergistic interactions)
- •Hatalı: 'WEDBA bu varsayımı kontrol etmeden uygulamak'. Doğrusu: Compensation is acceptable: high score on one criterion can offset low on another
- •Hatalı: 'WEDBA bu varsayımı kontrol etmeden uygulamak'. Doğrusu: Decision matrix is complete (no missing values)
- •Hatalı: WEDBA'yi 'Criteria strongly correlated → consider DEMATEL/ANP for interdependence' durumunda kullanmak: recommendation_metadata.not_recommended_when alternatif öneriyor.
- •Hatalı: WEDBA'yi 'Non-compensatory preferences → consider outranking (ELECTRE/PROMETHEE)' durumunda kullanmak: recommendation_metadata.not_recommended_when alternatif öneriyor.
Worked example
- 1.Adım 1 (F1): Step 1: Decision matrix X = [x_ij]_{m×n}. Formül: X = \big[x_{ij}\big]_{m\times n} Anchor: Dadelo 2014, Eq.(1)
- 2.Adım 2 (F2): Step 2: Vector normalisation r_ij. Formül: r_{ij} = \dfrac{x_{ij}}{\sqrt{\sum_{i=1}^{m} x_{ij}^{2}}} Anchor: Dadelo 2014, Eq.(2)
- 3.Adım 3 (F3): Step 3: Weighted matrix v_ij = w_j r_ij. Formül: v_{ij} = w_{j}\,r_{ij} Anchor: Dadelo 2014, Eq.(3)
- 4.Adım 4 (F4): Step 4: Best v_j^+ and worst v_j^- per criterion direction. Formül: v_{j}^{+} = \max_{i} v_{ij}\ (J^{+}),\ \min\ (J^{-});\quad v_{j}^{-}\text{ aksi} Anchor: Dadelo 2014, Eq.(4)
- 5.Adım 5 (F5): Step 5: Weighted Euclidean D_i^+ and D_i^-. Formül: D_{i}^{+} = \sqrt{\sum_{j}(v_{ij}-v_{j}^{+})^{2}},\quad D_{i}^{-} = \sqrt{\sum_{j}(v_{ij}-v_{j}^{-})^{2}} Anchor: Dadelo 2014, Eq.(5)
- 6.Adım 6 (F6): Step 6: Z_i = D_i^- / (D_i^+ + D_i^-); descending ranking. Formül: Z_{i} = \dfrac{D_{i}^{-}}{D_{i}^{+}+D_{i}^{-}},\quad 0\le Z_{i}\le 1 Anchor: Dadelo 2014, Eq.(6)
Commonly paired with
- •AHP + WEDBA (high)
- •BWM + WEDBA (high)
- •ENTROPY + WEDBA (high)
- •CRITIC + WEDBA (high)
- •SWARA + WEDBA (high)
How to cite
Dadelo, S.; Turskis, Z.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Dadeliene, R. (2014). Multi-criteria assessment and ranking system of sport team formation based on objective-measured values of criteria set. Expert Systems with Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.04.045