This page is published in English.
Ranking
Weighted Voting - Weighted positional aggregation of multiple rankings
Social choice - weighted positional voting rule
Arrow, K. J.1951doi:10.2307/1054318 ↗
Overview
Weighted Voting - Weighted positional aggregation of multiple rankings
- Output
- rank position, higher is better
- Data
- Crisp, complete rank
- Size
- 2+ alternatives, 3-12 criteria works best
- Used for
- Rank aggregation, social choice, preference fusion
How it works
- 1
Validate inputs for weighted-voting.
Arrow 1951, (pending PDF page verification)
Look elsewhere when
- •Cardinal preferences important. Use a MAUT method.
Assumptions to verify
- Input is a rank matrix (1=best, m=worst per voter)
- Each voter ranks all alternatives
Edge cases and pitfalls
Applying WEIGHTED-VOTING without verifying this assumption.
Requirement: Input is a rank matrix (1=best, m=worst per voter)
Applying WEIGHTED-VOTING without verifying this assumption.
Requirement: Each voter ranks all alternatives
Using WEIGHTED-VOTING when: Cardinal preferences important → use a MAUT method.
An alternative method is recommended in this situation.
How to cite
Arrow, K. J. (1951). Social Choice and Individual Values. Wiley, New York. https://doi.org/10.2307/1054318
System ID, as it appears in reports and the API
WEIGHTED-VOTING