Ranking
WPM: Weighted Product Model
Miller, D. W., Starr, M. K. · 1969
Overview
Multiplicative utility. Output typically utility (higher value = preferred).
Strengths
- •Method-specific: Multiplicative utility
Limitations
- •Assumes: Criteria preferences are independent (no synergistic interactions)
- •Assumes: Compensation is acceptable: high score on one criterion can offset low on another
- •Assumes: Decision matrix is complete (no missing values)
Method assistant
Grounded explanations: it explains the method, it does not compute.
Assumptions to verify
- •Criteria preferences are independent (no synergistic interactions)
- •Compensation is acceptable: high score on one criterion can offset low on another
- •Decision matrix is complete (no missing values)
When not to use
- •Criteria strongly correlated → consider DEMATEL/ANP for interdependence
- •Non-compensatory preferences → consider outranking (ELECTRE/PROMETHEE)
Edge cases
- •See F.steps and D.parameters for WPM-specific edge handling. recommendation_metadata.assumptions_to_verify also lists boundary conditions.
Common pitfalls
- •Hatalı: 'WPM bu varsayımı kontrol etmeden uygulamak'. Doğrusu: Criteria preferences are independent (no synergistic interactions)
- •Hatalı: 'WPM bu varsayımı kontrol etmeden uygulamak'. Doğrusu: Compensation is acceptable: high score on one criterion can offset low on another
- •Hatalı: 'WPM bu varsayımı kontrol etmeden uygulamak'. Doğrusu: Decision matrix is complete (no missing values)
- •Hatalı: WPM'yi 'Criteria strongly correlated → consider DEMATEL/ANP for interdependence' durumunda kullanmak: recommendation_metadata.not_recommended_when alternatif öneriyor.
- •Hatalı: WPM'yi 'Non-compensatory preferences → consider outranking (ELECTRE/PROMETHEE)' durumunda kullanmak: recommendation_metadata.not_recommended_when alternatif öneriyor.
Worked example
- 1.Adım 1 (F1): Step 1: Direction-aware normalisation (cost criteria inverted). Formül: r_{ij} = \begin{cases} x_{ij}/\max_{i} x_{ij} & j\in J^{+} \\ \min_{i} x_{ij}/x_{ij} & j\in J^{-} \end{cases} Anchor: Miller-Starr 1969, Ch.2
- 2.Adım 2 (F2): Step 2: Weighted product P_i = Π r_ij^{w_j} and descending ranking. Formül: P_{i} = \prod_{j=1}^{n} (r_{ij})^{w_{j}} Anchor: Miller-Starr 1969, Ch.2 Eq.(3)
Commonly paired with
- •AHP + WPM (high)
- •BWM + WPM (high)
- •ENTROPY + WPM (high)
- •CRITIC + WPM (high)
- •SWARA + WPM (high)
How to cite
Miller, D. W.; Starr, M. K. (1969). Executive Decisions and Operations Research. Prentice-Hall. https://doi.org/10.2307/1249834