This page is published in English.
Weight Objective
FARE - Factor Relationship weighting method
Weight_Subjective (pairwise factor relationship matrix, closed-form weights)
Ginevičius, R.2011doi:10.1142/S0219622011004713 ↗
Overview
FARE uses a one-directional factor relationship matrix - each row is filled independently (not required to be reciprocal). Row sums are normalised to weights. Simpler than AHP (no eigenvalue computation, no consistency check) but less rigorous.
- Output
- Weight, higher is better
- Data
- Crisp, complete numeric matrix
- Weights
- Derived internally, no weight source needed
- Size
- 2+ alternatives, 3-12 criteria works best
- Used for
- Any (objective weighting)
How it works
- 1
Sum each row of the relation matrix to get S_i = Σ_j f_{ij}. Normalise: w_i = S_i / Σ_k S_k.
Žižović et al. 2020, p.1101 Eqs.(1)-(2) (pending PDF page verification)
Look elsewhere when
- •No data variation (constant criterion). Weight degenerates.
- •Expert judgment is the actual driver. Use subjective weighting.
Assumptions to verify
- Decision matrix exists with measurable criteria
- Sufficient inter-alternative variation per criterion
Edge cases and pitfalls
Not requiring reciprocity means inconsistency can go undetected - always inspect row sums for reasonableness.
Works with
Commonly takes its weights from
Its derived weights can feed
How to cite
Ginevičius, R. (2011). A New Determining Method for the Criteria Weights in Multicriteria Evaluation. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622011004713
System ID, as it appears in reports and the API
FARE