This page is published in English.
Weight Objective
IDOCRIW - Integrated Determination of Objective CRIteria Weights
Integrated objective weighting (ENTROPY × CILOS product-normalisation)
Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.2012doi:10.1142/S0219622012400135 ↗
Overview
IDOCRIW combines two complementary objective weighting perspectives: ENTROPY captures inter-alternative variance (discrimination power) and CILOS captures inter-criterion conflict (loss when sacrificing one criterion for another). Their product amplifies criteria that score high on both dimensions.
- Output
- Weight, higher is better
- Data
- Crisp, complete numeric matrix
- Weights
- Derived internally, no weight source needed
- Size
- 2+ alternatives, 3-12 criteria works best
- Used for
- Any (objective weighting)
How it works
- 1
Compute Entropy weights w^E_j on the data.
Zavadskas-Podvezko 2016, p.10 Eq.(1)
- 2
Compute CILOS weights w^C_j on the data.
Zavadskas-Podvezko 2016, p.10 Eq.(2)
- 3
IDOCRIW weights w_j = (w^E_j · w^C_j) / Σ (w^E_k · w^C_k).
Zavadskas-Podvezko 2016, p.10 Eq.(3)
Look elsewhere when
- •No data variation (constant criterion). Weight degenerates.
- •Expert judgment is the actual driver. Use subjective weighting.
Assumptions to verify
- Decision matrix exists with measurable criteria
- Sufficient inter-alternative variation per criterion
Edge cases and pitfalls
If any CILOS weight q^C_j = 0 (all losses for criterion j are zero), then w_j = 0 regardless of entropy - inspect the loss matrix for degenerate rows.
Works with
Commonly takes its weights from
Its derived weights can feed
How to cite
Zavadskas, E. K.; Podvezko, V. (2012). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622012400135
System ID, as it appears in reports and the API
IDOCRIW