This page is published in English.
Weight Subjective
ROC - Rank Order Centroid weights (rank-based surrogate weights)
Weight_Subjective
Barron, F. H.1992doi:10.1016/0001-6918(92)90042-C ↗
Overview
ROC weights are surrogate weights derived purely from the rank order - no numeric importance judgements needed. They are the expected value of the weights given only their ordering. w_1>w_2>…>w_n always holds. Most weight is concentrated at rank 1.
- Output
- Weight, higher is better
- Data
- Crisp, expert input required
- Weights
- Derived internally, no weight source needed
- Size
- 2+ alternatives, 3-12 criteria works best
- Used for
- Expert-driven decision making, MAGDM
How it works
- 1
ROC weight for the criterion with rank r (out of n): w_r = (1/n) Σ_{k=r}^{n} (1/k). This is the centroid of the simplex constrained by the rank ordering.
Barron & Barrett 1996, p.1517 Eq.(2) (pending PDF page verification)
Fits when / Look elsewhere when
Fits when
- •Native group-decision support (multi-DM aggregation built into the pipeline)
Look elsewhere when
- •No experts available. Use objective weighting.
- •High inconsistency. Discard and re-elicit.
Assumptions to verify
- Domain experts available
- Experts can express consistent comparisons
Edge cases and pitfalls
ROC assigns weight only from rank, not magnitude - if the DM knows ratio importance (e.g. C1 is twice as important as C2), use direct rating (SMART) or BWM instead.
Works with
Commonly takes its weights from
Its derived weights can feed
How to cite
Barron, F. H. (1992). Selecting a best multiattribute alternative with partial information about attribute weights. Acta Psychologica. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(92)90042-C
System ID, as it appears in reports and the API
ROC-WEIGHT