This page is published in English.
Weight Subjective
DIBR - Defining Interrelationships Between Ranked criteria
Ranked criteria interrelationship weighting (non-pairwise sequential)
Pamučar, D., Deveci, M., Gokasar, I., Işık, M., Žižović, M.2021doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129096 ↗
Overview
DIBR requires n−1 adjacent relationship shares (no full pairwise matrix). For ranked adjacent criteria, γ is the lower-ranked criterion's share and w_{j+1}/w_j=γ/(1−γ).
- Output
- Weight, higher is better
- Data
- Crisp, expert input required
- Weights
- Derived internally, no weight source needed
- Size
- 2+ alternatives, 3-12 criteria works best
- Used for
- Expert-driven decision making, MAGDM
How it works
- 1
Kriterleri C_1 ≻ C_2 ≻ … ≻ C_n olarak sırala. Anchor: Pamučar et al. 2021, DIBR procedure.
- 2
Her komşu çift için alt sıradaki kriterin payı γ_{j,j+1} ile w_{j+1}/w_j=γ_{j,j+1}/(1−γ_{j,j+1}) ilişkisini kur.
- 3
Göreli ağırlıkları ardışık üret, toplamları 1 olacak biçimde normalize et ve özgün kriter sırasına geri yerleştir.
Fits when / Look elsewhere when
Fits when
- •Native group-decision support (multi-DM aggregation built into the pipeline)
Look elsewhere when
- •No experts available. Use objective weighting.
- •High inconsistency. Discard and re-elicit.
Assumptions to verify
- Domain experts available
- Experts can express consistent comparisons
Edge cases and pitfalls
γ=0 or γ>0.5 is invalid for a strict best-to-worst order; each adjacent share must be in (0,0.5].
Works with
Commonly takes its weights from
Its derived weights can feed
How to cite
Pamučar, D.; Deveci, M.; Gokasar, I.; Işık, M.; Žižović, M. (2021). Circular economy concepts in urban mobility alternatives using integrated DIBR method and fuzzy Dombi CoCoSo model. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129096
System ID, as it appears in reports and the API
DIBR