Weight_Objective
NMD: New Method of Determining objective criterion weights
Bulut, E. · 2017
Overview
Weight_Objective (normalised matrix column-mean based). Output typically weight (higher value = preferred).
Strengths
- •Method-specific: Weight_Objective (normalised matrix column-mean based)
Limitations
- •Assumes: Decision matrix exists with measurable criteria
- •Assumes: Sufficient inter-alternative variation per criterion
Method assistant
Grounded explanations: it explains the method, it does not compute.
Assumptions to verify
- •Decision matrix exists with measurable criteria
- •Sufficient inter-alternative variation per criterion
When not to use
- •No data variation (constant criterion) → weight degenerates
- •Expert judgment is the actual driver → use subjective weighting
Edge cases
- •See F.steps and D.parameters for NMD-specific edge handling. recommendation_metadata.assumptions_to_verify also lists boundary conditions.
Common pitfalls
- •Hatalı: 'NMD bu varsayımı kontrol etmeden uygulamak'. Doğrusu: Decision matrix exists with measurable criteria
- •Hatalı: 'NMD bu varsayımı kontrol etmeden uygulamak'. Doğrusu: Sufficient inter-alternative variation per criterion
- •Hatalı: NMD'yi 'No data variation (constant criterion) → weight degenerates' durumunda kullanmak: recommendation_metadata.not_recommended_when alternatif öneriyor.
- •Hatalı: NMD'yi 'Expert judgment is the actual driver → use subjective weighting' durumunda kullanmak: recommendation_metadata.not_recommended_when alternatif öneriyor.
Worked example
- 1.Adım 1 (F1): Step 1: Apply linear-max normalisation: benefit n_ij = x_ij/max; cost n_ij = min/x_ij. Formül: n_{ij}=x_{ij}/x_j^{\max}\text{(benefit)};\;n_{ij}=x_j^{\min}/x_{ij}\text{(cost)} Anchor: Bulut 2017, p.807 (pending PDF page verification)
- 2.Adım 2 (F2): Step 2: Compute column mean μ_j of normalised matrix. Compute w_j = (1 − μ_j) / Σ_k (1 − μ_k). Higher weight for lower mean (more variation from 1 = best). Formül: \mu_j=\frac{1}{m}\sum_i n_{ij};\quad w_j=\frac{1-\mu_j}{\sum_k(1-\mu_k)} Anchor: Bulut 2017, p.807 Eq. (pending PDF page verification)
Commonly paired with
- •NMD + TOPSIS (high)
- •NMD + VIKOR (high)
- •NMD + EDAS (high)
- •NMD + WASPAS (high)
- •NMD + MARCOS (high)
How to cite
Bulut, E. (2017). A comparative analysis of the criteria weights determination methods for selection of ship propulsion system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475090216666046